30.06.2016Roma integration: significant progress, but obstacles and dilemmas remain, reports the European Courts of Auditors
On June 28 the European Courts of Auditors published report about the state of Roma integration policy in 5 countries with significant share of Roma population. One of them is Bulgaria. Center Amalipe was visited during the field mission as well as some of the schools we work with. We congratulate the European Courts of Auditorsfor the report and call upon the national government of Bulgaria to undertake urgent actions for answering and applying the recommendationsfrom the report!
Below is summury of the document:
EU policy initiatives and EU-funded projects to promote Roma integration have made significant progress, but there are still obstacles and dilemmas which prevent the money from having the greatest possible impact, according to a new report from the European Court of Auditors. In particular, say the auditors, progress has been hampered by a lack of suitable data, including data on ethnicity.
The auditors assessed whether EU policy initiatives and financial support had contributed effectively to Roma integration during the last decade. They visited four Member States: Bulgaria, Spain, Hungary and Romania.
“As things stand, we don’t really know how well Roma are being integrated because we don’t have robust data; we don’t even know how many Roma there are. Of course, ethnicity is a sensitive issue; but unless this problem is resolved, policy-making will soon be hampered all the way to 2020,” said Mr Henri Grethen, the Member of the European Court of Auditors responsible for the report.
The auditors found that the Commission had made significant progress in setting out EU policy initiatives promoting Roma integration and that all Member States had developed a National Roma Integration Strategy by 2012. But this came too late to have an impact on programmes and projects for 2007-2013, and a number of shortcomings remained. First, the strategies did not indicate what level of funding was needed or the amount of money available; second, anti-discrimination, in particular anti-gypsyism, was not given enough attention; third, the need for active participation by representatives of the Roma was not always taken into account; and finally, the National Roma Contact Points set up to coordinate the development and implementation of the national strategies had sometimes been undermined by a mismatch of resources and responsibilities.
For 2014 to 2020, the auditors noted a number of improvements: Roma inclusion is explicitly referred to in the European Structural and Investment Funds Regulation, and a specific funding priority has been introduced to address it. Member States with country-specific recommendations, issued in the context of the European Semester, related to Roma integration are obliged to devote EU funds to promoting it. However, the auditors point out that additional efforts are required by both the Commission and the Member State to make sure that these changes will result in EU-funded projects better contributing to Roma inclusion on the ground.
Most projects examined had achieved their general inclusion objectives, although these were often not specifically Roma-related. Projects selected and implemented in accordance with the best practice criteria adopted by the Council were more likely to be effective.
The auditors make a number of recommendations to the Member States and to the European Commission.
The Member States should take the following steps:
• When revising their National Roma Integration Strategies, they should:
-
specify the level of funding needed for Roma integration measures proposed in their respective strategies;
-
include indicators and targets which deal with anti-discrimination or, more specifically, anti-gypsyism;
-
ensure that Roma representatives are consulted and included in planning integration measures; and
-
define in the role played by National Roma Contact Points in more detail.
• When implementing their operational programmes, they should:
-
make use of best practice criteria for Roma integration in proposals and for selecting projects; and
-
complement current output and results indicators with Roma-specific indicators, where appropriate.
• They should also consider acting together to ensure legal certainty on the use of ESF funds for social inclusion irrespective of a link to employment.
The Commission should:
• ensure that measures carried out under the ESIF are of an inclusive nature and contain provisions aimed at fighting segregation;
• make full use of the reports from Member States on effective Roma integration measures;
• ensure that Roma inclusion objectives in their National Roma Integration Strategies are reflected in the ESIF framework;
• consider legislation to ensure that, from 2020, the distribution of funds among Member States takes into account social inclusion indicators;
• work with the Member States on a common methodology for Roma ethnicity data to monitor their social inclusion; and
• encourage Member States to collect comprehensive statistical data on ethnicity within the next two years.
More information see at:
